.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Monday, February 28, 2005

College funding

The Minnesota Daily has a good article today about Pawlenty's plan to shift funding away from higher education facilities towards students. The University of Minnesota would be damaged by such a plan, and U officials make sure everybody knows it in this article.

Such a plan would "drive reform and change the higher education marketplace," according to the governor. I do not like free market fetishism, and this is a great example of it. The free market works wonders in a lot of situations. It works great in determining what fast food restaurants I will go to, for example, or where I will buy clothes, or anything of that nature. But a free market is not a panacea, and it breaks down when there are a lot of intangibles and the investment timeframes are measured in years and decades instead of days or minutes.

The University of Minnesota is striving to be one of the best research universities in the world. This brings a lot of ancillary benefits, but not all of them are easily and immediately quantifiable in terms of money. Many students may not care as much about that fact either. What they may want, many studies say, are great gyms, nice student housing, a nightlife, etc. These are all well and good, but if universities are forced by the marketplace to put resources into these things, it will have to take away from those things that have less immediate impact, like pure research. In the long run, we will get mediocre institutes of higher education that pander to the physical and psychological needs of students, not necessarily the intellectual needs of our society.

Higher education is not a Big Mac. The goal is not to give the largest amount of short-term pleasure in the quickest manner possible. Higher education exists to educate, and yes, even undertake some research that may not be immediately cost-effective. Funding higher education through American Idol-type popularity contests is not a good idea.


At 10:42 AM, March 01, 2005, Blogger DP said...

Higher education is not a big mac.That's good.

Another point in terms of the dollar question that gets overlooked is that a highly ranked research institution brings federal dollars into the state. The better a university is and the more resources it has, the easier it is to get federal research grants. That is money into the state economy.

At 11:03 AM, March 01, 2005, Blogger Robb said...

nor is education of any kind a manufactured widget that can be dealt with in terms of industrial manufacturing. It's not about the bottom line. It's about the quality of the education.

At 5:15 AM, October 05, 2005, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

I have a Free site Free Article Search. It pretty much covers american author related stuff.

Come and check it out if you get time :-)

At 7:02 AM, October 05, 2005, Blogger Skip Weisman said...

You've got a good point in your last posting. Most people would not get it, but the way you explained goal and objective, it makes all the sense in the world. I should know because I post similar information about goal and objective.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home