.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Wednesday, December 22, 2004

Republicans don't want to defend their records

State Representative Ray Cox is the only legislator I know of who has a blog. It's nice to see a legislator use technology in this way, even if it is a Republican. However, in a recent blog post, Rep. Cox also laments negative campaigning, agreeing with Lynne Osterman's claim that negative campaigning is akin to cheating.

Cox is another one of those more moderate Republicans. He is especially concerned about environmental issues, and has broken with Republican leadership on some bills in this area. Nevertheless, even he seems to think that making him defend his voting record is "cheating." Why are Republicans so afraid to defend their records? Why can't they proudly stand up and say, "Yes, I voted against the electronic recycling bill, for the concealed-carry bill, and for the anti-gay marriage amendment. I am proud of these votes."

For some reason, though, Republicans don't want to do that. Perhaps they realize that people aren't in favor of weakening environmental standards, or cutting taxes for the wealthy, or helping HMOs at the expense of the middle class. They can't win a debate on these issues, because they are on the wrong side of all of them.

1 Comments:

At 1:23 PM, December 23, 2004, Blogger Erik said...

I don't know much about Minnesota politics, but it seems to me that at the national level, legislators don't want to defend their records because defending a legislative record is hard. Getting things done requires compromises and deal-making, and there are always votes you've made whose history you can't explain to voters within their short attention span.

This is one reason we don't elect senators to the presidency anymore.

Ray Cox may, on the other hand, have voted for evil things because he truly believes in them. But in general, the drawbacks of a voting record in the real world of legislation are nonpartisan.

--Erik Ostrom (erstwhile Minnesotan)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home